Stereotypes
made of non-English speakers are commonly seen and heard of. This type of linguistic
discrimination can be commonly seen in work and school environments, healthcare,
social circles, etc. Many view those with broken English as un-educated, and are
un-able to view them from a professional stance, as people are “less likely to
believe something if it’s said with a foreign accent”, according to
psycholinguistic Lev Ari. These stereotypes are often made by those not as
culturally-aware, as they may reside in regions with less of an international
demographic. Linguistic differences can often lead to inability to access jobs,
education or healthcare due to downgrading stereotypes. People are “easy to
make judgment’s about a person’s cultural affiliation or education” due to the
way they speak a language, even if the speaker is well educated and
knowledgeable, as said by sociolinguist Ingrid Piller. From personal experience,
having to master two languages is a hard task. Creating stereotypes about
people solely based on their ability to speak the preferred language of the local culture is wrong. The individual could be able to excel in understanding the
language, but just lack the ability to speak it back. A person’s ability to
speak the language should not create any societal limits for them, as they are
still valuable human beings just like the rest of the native speakers in that
society.
Take
Stephen Hawking for example; he is a mastermind although he lacks the ability
to express his thoughts verbally. Although his inability is due to a terminal
condition, this relates to the idea of one having brilliant ideas, but not
being able to express them through the ‘wanted’ language. I believe that what
one has to offer to the table is much more important than how they communicate
it. It is understandable that some professions require excelling English due to
reliability issues, however this means there are a plethora of job
opportunities left that do not necessarily have this requirement. Having ‘broken’
English usually concludes that the speaker excels at their home language, which
may be much harder to learn than English itself. As well, the individual is
still able to learn and better their English language. Ones ability to speak a
language does not reflect their interest in it, as they may have started
learning it at a later stage in life. It should be respected that the person
took the time to learn any English, and are trying to use it to the best of
their ability, instead of creating negative stereotypes around it. The reality is
that more foreign dialects are to be seen in workplaces, healthcare centers,
etc. as cities are growing with international people. It is up to one’s ability
to accept others from different cultures, and not judge/associate them to existing
negative stereotypes, in order to create accepting societies.
The blog post was really well done, you shared your thoughts and opinions and it meets the conventions of an opinion column. Bringing the example of Stephen Hawking and quoting other sources definitely improved the validness of your argument. I agree that ones ability to speak a language does not reflect their interest and that what a person has to offer is so much more important than their ability to speak English correctly.
ReplyDeleteI could find almost nothing to correct as all the arguments were valid and reasonable.